Might be good to take a post-funding look at existing evidence-based arguments, such as they are, and take it from there. At CTLGH we’re keen to tap into past and present PROJECTS and their knowledge artefacts, which tend to disappear from view once funding is secured and spent, The compelling arguments are locked up in (often eloquent) project…[Read more]
Can we move from taking cursory looks to actually mapping (or making lists of) the existing Genbanks and databases? Who would be well placed to do that? Do they know about us and could we get them interested?
Couldn’t agree more. Of course ‘advocacy’ shouldn’t be left to chance – we have to make a business case for WHY donors should get on board. Maybe think of them as ‘investors’ in tropical livelihoods